Why IE9 is a Web Designer’s Nightmare

Re:Why IE9 is a Web Designer’s Nightmare by sukuriant on Friday March 18, 2011 @12:31PM (#2340902)

There has been a notable amount of hate on IE9's lack of XP support, so I thought I'd ask. Has anyone happened to read ~why~ IE 9 isn't supported in Windows XP? People continue to be angry that it's not, but has anyone actually checked why it's not supported?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why IE9 is a Web Designer’s Nightmare by jstedfast on Friday March 18, 2011 @12:40PM (#2340931)

Don't quote me on this, but I thought it was because IE9 made heavy use of Direct2D from DirectX10 or 11 or some such which XP doesn't have access to.

Firefox 4 uses the same Direct2D stuff but has a software fallback. It could be argued that IE9 should also have a software fallback, but they don't.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why IE9 is a Web Designer’s Nightmare by zaatar on Saturday March 19, 2011 @05:07AM (#2343251)

IE9 does indeed have software fallback. You can toggle the setting from inetcpl.cpl -> advanced to disable hardware acceleration if you wish.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why IE9 is a Web Designer’s Nightmare by pilif on Friday March 18, 2011 @12:58PM (#2341009)

There must be some kind of fallback because IE9 runs fine inside a virtual machine with disabled graphics acceleration.

[ Parent | on HN ]