News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by ardit33 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @02:44PM (#23407112)
you made the parent's point, your picture looks good, but still not as a good as a professional one, taken with a good camera

I have a mirrorless cameras, and time to time I use it... and the pictures I get with it are still much better than my iphonex

Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by manmal on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @04:21PM (#23408161)
It’s the same for me. I have a quite cheap portrait lens for my old Sony Nex-3, and the pictures I get out of it are (subjectively) so much better than those taken with my iPhone XS, with actual bokeh and real depth.
Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by bergstromm466 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:23PM (#23408958)
I mean, can anything really ever be objective? Or are things just continually witnessed, from tens - to trillions - of times?
Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by manmal on Thursday June 04, 2020 @01:42AM (#23412949)
I would say if you perform a double blind study with a decent sample size, you will indeed reach objective conclusions, and you will even know the probability that your observation is correct.
Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by gambiting on Thursday June 04, 2020 @04:16AM (#23414024)
Right, but the parent's point was specifically that pictures taken on phones don't look good in large size....and all I'm saying is that yes, they do sometimes. Obviously had this been in the dark, the result would be abysmal. But in conditions like the ones in the picture? The print is completely ok in my(non-professional) opinion.
Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by rangibaby on Thursday June 04, 2020 @09:24AM (#23416232)
Better gear = a wider range of “sometimes”