News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by alistairSH on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @11:34AM (#23404514)
You're absolutely correct. And it's no different than any other art.

But, there are edge cases where a cellphone camera just doesn't work very well. Capturing motion (sports, kids), low-light (bars, concerts, indoor sports), telephoto (birds and animals), and macro (100% scale, insects, flowers, some product photography).

Of course, the best camera is the one you have with you. And cellphone cameras mean that we always have a camera in our pocket or purse. But, I still bring 1-2 camera bodies and 2-4 lenses on most vacations.

Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by phkahler on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @12:47PM (#23405520)
I just got a "real" camera a few years ago and I find it much better than any of our phone cameras. The thing is the phones have gotten a lot better and are no longer "good enough" but are actually nice. Big lenses and large sensors are still a lot better, but you often can't tell if pictures never go beyond your phone or social media posts.
Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by mcguire on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @03:10PM (#23407403)
The best portraits I ever took were with a 75mm lens and 2x teleconverter. Nothing is out of proportion and the people look natural because they don't have a camera in their faces. That's hard to do with a cell phone.
Re:Thoughts on cameras in the age of excellent cell phone ph... by galaxyLogic on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @01:39PM (#23406232)
I think the right approach is to have both, if you are a serious photo-hobbyist. You need a phone anyway.

The value of a good phone-camera is that you most always have it with you.

A picture is only as good as the thing it is a picture of.