News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on US Park Police denies using tear gas on peaceful protesters. Parent comment

Re:US Park Police denies using tear gas on peaceful protesters by barbegal on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @10:26AM (#23403654)
Where does the CDC define pepper balls as "tear gas"? It defines them as "riot control agents" in this document https://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/riotcontrol/factsheet.asp saying that these are "sometimes referred to as “tear gas”"

The CDC defines chloroacetophenone (CN) as tear gas https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750...

Pepper balls contain oleoresin capsicum (OC) which is different in terms of its chemical composition but produces similar symptoms.

Depending on your definition, it may or may not be the same thing because "tear gas" is an unscientific term.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US Park Police denies using tear gas on peaceful protesters by joshstrange on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @10:32AM (#23403726)
Yes I referring to the CDC [0] page that says:

> Riot control agents (sometimes referred to as “tear gas”) are chemical compounds that temporarily make people unable to function by causing irritation to the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, and skin.

I think we all agree that "gas/chemicals that cause tears" is "tear gas". Anyone saying that tear gas was not used is splitting hairs and their motivations should be questioned. This is not the time to be "technically correct" when police are using things like this on peaceful protesters.

[0] https://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/riotcontrol/factsheet.asp

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US Park Police denies using tear gas on peaceful protesters by sukilot on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @10:44AM (#23403865)
I think the relevant question is, when arguing semantics with the US Executive Branch, is the statement more or less precisely accurate than the common use of language by the Executive Branch's leader and commander-in-chief?

By that standard, it's tear gas.

[ Parent | on HN ]