Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by stickac on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:28AM
(#23401886)
Keybase is dead. In the PR they were explicit they were hired to work on Zoom and not continue working on Keybase. Luckily there is keys.pub
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by fareesh on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:57AM
(#23401717)
Is keybase fully open source? Or is the server closed source?
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by eddieoz on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:03AM
(#23401758)
The server stills closed but seems there're people saying the server-side is not needed(!) to trust the platform.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Keybase/comments/77c241/keybase_why...
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by sukilot on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @10:37AM
(#23403788)
Why (!)?
Of course servers are untrusted. If you think you need to see the server source then any trust you have is mistaken.
Same as with HTTPS. If you think you need to trust the MITM, you've already lost
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by eddieoz on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @11:42AM
(#23404649)
I think you don't need to trust the server just if you can audit the frontend and assure it does not share any sensitive information with the server-side.
If they apply the concept of data minimisation, decentralisation and distribution properly, there are fewer risks involved.
But, if the server manages sensitive information, yes. It is preferable to audit the server code to understand how they handle the lifecycle of the information.
"If you think you need to see the server source then any trust you have is mistaken."
Sorry but I don't agree. I trust in systems I can verify. Trust without verifying is not trust, it is faith.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by jrochkind1 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @12:45PM
(#23405500)
OK, but that doesn't help you when they shut down the server, which I think is what this thread was about? That zoom purchased it as an aquihire to have staff work on zoom, and isn't committed to the platform.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by eddieoz on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @01:40PM
(#23406239)
Agreed, but a server turned off has lower risks to leak information. And I think also they bought the expertise of the team to improve zoom, more than getting the solution per se. It will take some months to have this question answered (about what will really happen to keybase)
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by jrochkind1 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @04:06PM
(#23408014)
Clearly, a product which has been discontinued has less of a chance of violating your privacy, that's true.... I think there are a couple different non-intersecting conversations going on here...
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by eddieoz on Thursday June 04, 2020 @04:53AM
(#23414258)
But was it discontinued?
I was looking into their terms (https://keybase.io/docs/terms) and they should notify before it. And seems my account is up over there.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by StavrosK on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:48AM
(#23401678)
Paying leaves a verified trace though.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by mkagenius on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:07AM
(#23401775)
True, but they can't know the content at all.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by lb1lf on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:26AM
(#23401875)
-No worries, they'll just assume the content is malicious, then. (/s. I hope.)
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by bborud on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:49AM
(#23401683)
It sounds like bullshit. I don't think the reason to avoid keybase is necessarily because it draws their security from authorities into question, but it does call into question if a company that would say something that looks like impulsive nonsense is someone you want to trust.
This also makes none or very little sense - if this is actually just to cooperate with law enforcement, why would encrypting corporate (or paying) calls be any better, the bad people that are referred to in the statement could just get a paid plan?