Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by jmastrangelo on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @12:53PM
(#23393159)
Focusing on the gear seems like a cheap and easy solution compared to fixing training and accountability, the actual root of the issue.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by thewebcount on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @01:54PM
(#23393889)
There is evidence that demilitarizing the police works (along with other things) and that some training doesn't.[0] I'm all for accountability, which the link also says helps.
[0]https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1180655701271732224.html
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by zentiggr on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @01:05PM
(#23393301)
When has legislation ever solved the underlying problem (uncontrolled violence in this case)?
Legislation almost always winds up being the softball nearby target that does something visible, not necessarily something useful.
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by bsanr on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @02:10PM
(#23394069)
Gear and training dovetail. Like at many companies, LEO training has been "game-ified", and much of it consists of playing with toys procured at taxpayer expense.
Have fun with this one, folks:
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by codezero on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @01:32PM
(#23393634)
I completely agree, though I assume it's because the federal government only pulls federal levers without new legislation. I bet they have more federal programs for military gear redistribution than they do to subsidize training.
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by inerte on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @01:00PM
(#23393244)
No when life gives you lemons, there is no need for whataboutism. Let’s keep pressuring and working to get to training and accountability too.
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by dang on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @02:03PM
(#23393978)
This comment breaks the site guidelines against calling names in arguments ("whataboutism"). Please don't do that.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by inerte on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @02:52PM
(#23394696)
Didn’t know, sorry about that.
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by dang on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @03:43PM
(#23395412)
Appreciated!
Re:Lawmakers begin bipartisan push to cut off police access ...
by webmaven on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @07:40PM
(#23397853)
Is that actually name-calling? It's a description of a comment (or a argument), not of a person.
I mean, if it is, then so would calling out someone's comment as an ad-hominem, right.