Re:Zuckerberg Leaves Racial Justice Leader Frustrated After ...
by flmlta on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @11:53AM
(#23392388)
>I think there are some things that are objectively censor worth (child pornography)
How about advocating violence or harm to others?
Re:Zuckerberg Leaves Racial Justice Leader Frustrated After ...
by rsweeney21 on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @12:36PM
(#23392962)
Wouldn't that be ok in war time?
What if I say "You should defend your property from criminals." That's advocating violence.
What about advocating for late-term abortions? A huge portion of the US feel like that is harming an unborn human being.
What about advocating for the death penalty in states where it is legal?
I don't see how you could objectively make censorship judgements on this kind of speech.
Let's say we decide to go to war with China. Should Facebook censor anti-Chinese content? Should it censor anti-war content?
I think there are some things that are objectively censor worth (child pornography) and then there is a lot of gray area. My question to Facebook employees who oppose Mark's viewpoint is: "What is your solution and how do you prevent Facebook from censoring anything you don't agree with?"