Re:Die photos and analysis of the revolutionary 8008 micropr...
by bogomipz on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @06:52PM
(#23397455)
The picture under the heading "The structure of the chip" has two arrows pointing to polysilicon regions. Does anyone know why the polysilicon region that the upper arrows points to is os much larger than the polysilicon regions that the lower arrow points to? They seem like a couple of order of magnitude larger.
Re:Die photos and analysis of the revolutionary 8008 micropr...
by wtallis on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @10:59PM
(#23399224)
Looking at one of the labeled diagrams [0], it looks like all the large areas of polysilicon are either serpentine structures that are probably resistors, or they're adjacent to one of the power rails. The ones you're referring to seem to be at the top of the instruction register section and right below the Vdd (-9V) line. So we may simply be looking at larger transistors to handle more current and voltage.
Re:Die photos and analysis of the revolutionary 8008 micropr...
by Mitzz on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @11:16PM
(#23399303)
I know slightly less than nothing about this topic, but I remember reading this from a while back:
"Notes for reversers
Electron holes have more effective mass, and therefore less mobility. P-type regions are thus made bigger than N-type regions to compensate. The size disparity often differentiates P-type and N-type silicon."
Re:Die photos and analysis of the revolutionary 8008 micropr...
by kens on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @02:38AM
(#23400592)
The "extra" polysilicon region is a capacitor made of silicon and polysilicon. These capacitors were a "bootstrap load", essentially a way to drive a transistor harder to get a stronger output. The capacitors you're looking at are for the instruction register to drive the signals through the instruction decoder (basically a PLA). Since the decoder is fairly large, the signals into it need to be boosted. I haven't looked at this for several years, so I may be wrong about some of this.
Re:Die photos and analysis of the revolutionary 8008 micropr...
by bogomipz on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:49PM
(#23409246)
Your link has a great pic of the original schematic print out. Might you or anyone else know if there is a high-res version of the printout online anywhere? Cheers.
Re:Die photos and analysis of the revolutionary 8008 micropr...
by Arbalest on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @07:10PM
(#23397626)
I'm curious, what could be made out of a processor in the order of 4000 transistors as here, but with entirely modern chip design and fabrication tech? What could you put out on TSMC's 7nm, presumably an extremely small wafer.
Re:Die photos and analysis of the revolutionary 8008 micropr...
by close04 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @04:44AM
(#23401349)
Apparently those are derivative of a much newer controller, the Intel 8051 (1980), heavily modified, running at up to 450MHz, and with added hardware accelerators.
http://www.visual6502.org/images/6502/layers_index.html 6502 Images
[0] https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-nHUr8PLBS-8/WF4ffgi2aiI/A...
"Notes for reversers Electron holes have more effective mass, and therefore less mobility. P-type regions are thus made bigger than N-type regions to compensate. The size disparity often differentiates P-type and N-type silicon."
Source: http://siliconzoo.org/tutorial.html
Maybe that is helpful...?
http://www.intel4004.com/btstrp.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_MCS-51#Use_as_intellectu...