Re:Publishers File Suit Against Internet Archive
by tosers4 on Monday June 01, 2020 @12:46PM
(#23380542)
Isn't SciHub just a rich "client" for LibGen?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Publishers File Suit Against Internet Archive
by notriddle on Monday June 01, 2020 @02:46PM
(#23382163)
SciHub is a web service that downloads papers on demand. In addition to serving the paper up, they also send a backup to LibGen, making LibGen's scientific paper section an archive of SciHub.
Re:Publishers File Suit Against Internet Archive
by toomuchtodo on Monday June 01, 2020 @12:48PM
(#23380557)
Implementation detail I gloss over for the audience.
Re:Publishers File Suit Against Internet Archive
by 411111111111111 on Monday June 01, 2020 @04:18PM
(#23383266)
Would you call Netflix a rich client for s3 though?
I think there is value in the destinction if it's only used as a storage backend, but actually gets the media through different sources.
Re:Publishers File Suit Against Internet Archive
by toomuchtodo on Monday June 01, 2020 @04:33PM
(#23383435)
No, I'd call Netflix a rich client for Netflix's OpenConnect appliance network.
To be clear, I have a deep appreciation for SciHub and LibGen, I just don't have the energy to dive in depth in this forum.
Re:Publishers File Suit Against Internet Archive
by 411111111111111 on Monday June 01, 2020 @04:41PM
(#23383537)
I thought the openconnect network was basically just a cache which tries to serve popular media directly from the providers?
They didn't have enough storage for their full library on the appliances previously. So that'd be like a caching proxy in front of the service
Maybe that changed with how tiny their library became over the years. (Edit:it didn't change. That's what it is.)