News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Battle of Helm’s Deep, Part V: Ladders Are Chaos by arethuza on Monday June 01, 2020 @04:40AM (#23376444)
Not sure if this is relevant or not, but I'm pretty sure the equivalents designs for cannons (e.g. on the walls of Fort George in Scotland) are as described and are widest on the outward part.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_George,_Highland

Re:The Battle of Helm’s Deep, Part V: Ladders Are Chaos by m4rtink on Monday June 01, 2020 @05:19AM (#23376638)
Sure, but those usually have a gun shield protecting the gun crew & it is done due to the gun barrel being long & the gun being heavy, so it is better to mount it on a single point, instead to jave it traverse on a curve (which is not a problem for an archer).
Re:The Battle of Helm’s Deep, Part V: Ladders Are Chaos by arethuza on Monday June 01, 2020 @06:04AM (#23376894)
Did 18th century cannons have gun shields?
Re:The Battle of Helm’s Deep, Part V: Ladders Are Chaos by m4rtink on Monday June 01, 2020 @09:41AM (#23378308)
My main reference are the pre WWII Czechslovak border defenses - these do have gun shields & apertures that get wider to the outside:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:85mm_kan%C3%B3n_... https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:4cm_kan%C3%B3n_v...

Not that the apertures are stepped instead of smooth - I guess the avoid the funneling effect mentioned above, possibly changing a near miss to deflection and hit on the gun shield. Should not happen if the steps get in the way.

Re:The Battle of Helm’s Deep, Part V: Ladders Are Chaos by KineticLensman on Monday June 01, 2020 @09:06AM (#23377973)
Apparently not [0]. IANA cannon expert but I think in the 18th C their biggest threat would have been from cavalry rather than sharpshooting infantry or precision fire from other cannon.

[0] https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=18+century++cannon&tbm=isc...