News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by jazzyjackson on Monday June 01, 2020 @02:11AM (#23375828)
As soon as deepfakes and "thispersondoesnotexist" started happening I wanted a tool that would replace everyone's face with a auto-generated face just so I could do street photography without feeling like I was invading people's right to obscurity
Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by shavingspiders on Monday June 01, 2020 @06:52AM (#23377183)
That's a really interesting idea. I'm not sure what the commercial value would be, but the artistic value (and gain in privacy) would be huge. I'm not sure what you'd do about identifying marks like tattoos, but perhaps that isn't the biggest concern when compared to faces.

Could you train a model with your own face as a start, and then run your photos through an existing consumer face-swap app? Or perhaps use a celebrities likeness? I wonder how much the visual 'likeness' of a stranger is worth.

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by jb1533063 on Monday June 01, 2020 @11:56AM (#23379893)
Commercial value may be for filmmakers who would no longer have to worry about getting waivers from people in the background of live shots. (Not a lawyer.)
Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by thr0w__4w4y on Monday June 01, 2020 @02:27PM (#23381920)
Also not a lawyer, and US-based in case it varies by country.

Do you know if a waiver is needed in this case? My understanding is that I can walk down a sidewalk, around Disneyland, around a resort, and film anyone / anything in plain sight. (I don't do that, by the way...) In other words, assuming you're not climbing over railings etc., if you can see it with your eyes, you can film it or photograph it.

Wonder if anyone here (plenty of legal eagles I'm sure) can confirm this or correct this. We don't need to get bogged down in corner cases & rare exceptions... for example, I think I heard that in some states, if the police ask (demand?) that you stop recording, you have to, otherwise you're in violation of the law... but even as I type that, as an American, it just sounds wrong... but I don't know.

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by mikepurvis on Monday June 01, 2020 @03:34PM (#23382727)
Also not a lawyer, but I think it mostly has to do with commercial use. Filming people at Disney for your Instagram followers is different from making a feature film and turning everyone standing around on a busy street into uncredited extras.

This particular site is with respect to Canada, but I'm pretty sure the same basic idea applies everywhere:

"When publishing photos for commercial purposes: You need the permission of every identifiable model in the photo, even if the photo was taken in a public space. For example, if a photo has 10 identifiable models in the photo, you would require a model release for each of them."

https://www.lawdepot.ca/law-library/faq/model-and-entertainm...

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by kickscondor on Monday June 01, 2020 @02:25AM (#23375867)
This is a cool idea. Oh to be a streamer with an auto generated face. Reminds me of A Scanner Darkly.
Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by m_eiman on Monday June 01, 2020 @06:01AM (#23376876)
Should be slowly morphing between different faces, maybe 10 minutes or so per transition. Should be fairly unsettling to watch! :D
Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by livq on Monday June 01, 2020 @10:46AM (#23378991)
I've always been partial to the laughing man from Ghost in the Shell. This would be a perfect use case :P
Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by ikeyany on Monday June 01, 2020 @03:09PM (#23382418)
A tool that automatically turns background faces into the faces of random animals would actually do quite well.