Why does OpenBSD still include Perl in its base installation?

Re:Why does OpenBSD still include Perl in its base installat... by eitland on Saturday May 30, 2020 @01:15PM (#23362745)

Of course you cannot relicense someone elses git repo.

Copying BSD code and distributing it under another license (even a commercial one) seems to be totally OK though as long as you put in the correct notices.

That is what GPL is meant to protect against.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why does OpenBSD still include Perl in its base installat... by greggyb on Saturday May 30, 2020 @02:02PM (#23363179)

Right, but the GPL license's protection also means that a BSD cannot be distributed under the BSD license (or similar) if it includes GPL components. This is why OpenBSD excludes GPL components.

GPL enhances user freedom at the expense of restricting what programmers can do.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why does OpenBSD still include Perl in its base installat... by eitland on Saturday May 30, 2020 @02:25PM (#23363374)

> Right, but the GPL license's protection also means that a BSD cannot be distributed under the BSD license (or similar) if it includes GPL components.

I fail to see how this is different from what I wrote above (except for the missing word in my post above):

> You cannot however mix GPL code into your BSD code and [distribute] the resulting work as BSD.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why does OpenBSD still include Perl in its base installat... by greggyb on Saturday May 30, 2020 @05:21PM (#23364843)

I didn't pay enough attention to usernames as I was replying and thought I was talking to multiple people through the chain.

We are in verbose (and unnecessary on my part) agreement.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why does OpenBSD still include Perl in its base installat... by trasz on Saturday May 30, 2020 @04:16PM (#23364276)

The “correct notice” being the original BSD license.

[ Parent | on HN ]