Re:The Vintage Beauty of Soviet Control Rooms (2018)
by paleogizmo on Thursday May 28, 2020 @05:51PM
(#23343194)
I recall that there were some pretty long threads here after the US warship hitting some commercial vessel. The big issue wasn't using a screen but that the designers had taken advantage of having screens to create a multi-functional interface so one station could serve different functions, or functions could be moved between stations. Flexible, but confusing. I think the move is not to analog control, but back to single-purpose controls. Also, even if mechanical controls replace touchscreens, I'm sure that there will still be an optical encoder and field bus behind everything.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Vintage Beauty of Soviet Control Rooms (2018)
by pbhjpbhj on Friday May 29, 2020 @10:23AM
(#23350270)
Why not physical analogue controls that are motorised like in some aeroplane controls. You can turn the dial, or the computer can turn the dial - and supposedly (737Max aside) allow physical control to override.
Being able to replace a physical station seems a great benefit in a warship.
Re:The Vintage Beauty of Soviet Control Rooms (2018)
by jayelbe on Friday May 29, 2020 @06:14AM
(#23348243)
https://features.propublica.org/navy-uss-mccain-crash/navy-i...
It was a really good read!