Re:Deaths per unit of energy for various sources
by brown9-2 on Wednesday March 16, 2011 @03:16PM
(#2333450)
So then are you making an assertion ("Some would argue that 50,000 have already died from a nuclear incident") which you also argue can never be proven true?
Re:Deaths per unit of energy for various sources
by eliasmacpherson on Wednesday March 16, 2011 @03:37PM
(#2333531)
Yes, that's it. My wording is terrible. I'm saying there's an argument. I'm not saying which side of the argument is right or wrong. As time goes on, it becomes more and more difficult to know the extent. Only in the fullness of time could the extent possibly be known due to the delay in related deaths. It won't be known because it hasn't been monitored, and there are conflicting statistics.
http://www.iaea.org/About/mission.html[1]
edit: IAEA article II "Objectives" of their statute[2]: "The Agency shall seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world. It shall ensure, so far as it is able, that assistance provided by it or at its request or under its supervision or control is not used in such a way as to further any military purpose."
http://www.iaea.org/About/statute_text.html[2]