Re:Americans, it turns out, would rather visit a store than ...
by im3w1l on Thursday May 28, 2020 @05:03AM
(#23335066)
I think it's more that hiring a housekeeper is an option that most users of these services haven't given serious consideration. They don't know how it works or where they would start.
Re:Americans, it turns out, would rather visit a store than ...
by fsckboy on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @03:09PM
(#23328320)
> The explanation that you're providing is really a rationalization for paying more to procure an inferior product
the explanation I gave is literally for paying less, so you missed the point of it, and you are then blaming econ 101 for your lack of understanding. And you are mixing in other factors that econ 101 covers, but the point of econ 101 is to learn to separate different factors.
Re:Americans, it turns out, would rather visit a store than ...
by Spooky23 on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @04:21PM
(#23329422)
The Instacart guy isn't a magic elf. The $0.05 you save on rotten fruit is offset by a $0.50 in labor.
As investors tire of setting money on fire, that will become more apparent, just as it did with Uber as prices went up and quality went down.
The explanation that you're providing is really a rationalization for paying more to procure an inferior product. You're always going to have wastage of perishable items. It's much cheaper and sensical to avoid moldy strawberries, close to date meat and dairy, etc by shopping yourself, or hiring your own casual labor without some intermediary subtracting value.
All of these services are hiding costs through VC largesse and exploitation. You can literally get more for less by just hiring a housekeeper and having them pick up stuff for you, but nobody does that because the costs are "above the line", and it feels less nouveau riche and more clean to have some service exploit the poor sap picking your banannas rather than talk to a human.