News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's New with Qt for Android by csdreamer7 on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @08:26AM (#23322144)
> license for that kind of devices is quite shady

Would you please describe what exactly is shady in the licensing for someone looking at Qt?

My bigger issue is that they are inflexible with their licenses for small businesses. Either you use LGPL, which requires copyleft on bundled mobile apps (I believe) or you pay based on the total revenue of your business, no matter how small the app is, as told by Michael Dominick on the Coder Radio podcast. Can be quick expensive if you want to launch a new product line, as Mike did. He decided to rewrite his app in C# and AvaloniaUI for Windows/Linux cross platform support.

https://github.com/AvaloniaUI/Avalonia

> that they have a clear history to do major breaking changes at each major release

This is a major issue for me.

Re:What's New with Qt for Android by adev_ on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @10:23AM (#23323758)
> Either you use LGPL, which requires copyleft on bundled mobile apps (I believe)

LGPL never enforced any copyleft to something linked on it. This is a wrong, unfortunately common misconception.

Re:What's New with Qt for Android by csdreamer7 on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @10:57AM (#23324342)
> LGPL never enforced any copyleft to something linked on it. This is a wrong, unfortunately common misconception.

Please read my comment carefully. I never said 'linked'.

Re:What's New with Qt for Android by adev_ on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @01:23PM (#23326647)
> Please read my comment carefully. I never said 'linked'.

"bundle" does not change anything, you still do not need copyleft on your app.