Facebook executives shut down efforts to make the site less divisive

Re:Facebook executives shut down efforts to make the site le... by nickff on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @02:12PM (#23314493)

I didn't say that nobody raised concerns, I said:

>>"I haven't seen any evidence that someone specifically predicted the chain of events which would unfold on those flights, and clearly communicated the issue, then had executive(s) respond that it was 'worth the money'."

In large projects like the MAX, there are always people raising concerns.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook executives shut down efforts to make the site le... by whatshisface on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @02:28PM (#23314696)

>In large projects like the MAX, there are always people raising concerns.

Does that mean that people raising concerns can be ignored, or does that mean that most large projects only get by with luck?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook executives shut down efforts to make the site le... by nickff on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @02:37PM (#23314819)

I think that's a really interesting question, but I think the answer is orthogonal to your dichotomy. In my experience, very successful projects depend on the great managers that know who to listen to in each different situation, and they know how people will react in each situation.

One of the best examples of this is Dave Lewis, who lead the design of the F-4 Phantom II, one of the most successful fighter aircraft of all time. He directed the structural design team to design for 80% of the required ultimate load, because he knew that everyone was conservative in their numbers; then the design was tested. The structure ended up lighter than comparable aircraft, and the Phantom II had phenomenal performance.

It also helps if the managers are good at making predictions of their own; Tetlock has written two great books about this, including: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superforecasting:_The_Art_and_...

[ Parent | on HN ]