The commenter above you believes that inclusivity standards will lead to a situation whereby one party could claim that certain genuinely controversial statements are actually beyond reasonable dispute, and that any such dispute could therefore only come about as a consequence of the disagreeing party not accepting the first party and/or their identity.

That was surprisingly difficult. Frankly, it's a little strange to see such an illucid response being seemingly well received by HN.

Perhaps your difficulties with comprehension regarding the comment are more orthogonal than you might have led yourself to believe?

Ironically, I don't know what you're saying here.

> Perhaps your difficulties with comprehension regarding the comment are more orthogonal

'My difficulties with comprehension' constitute one metric. Orthogonality, in any way that I understand it, is a property of multiple such metrics.