Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by varjag on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @08:10AM
(#23310106)
You should factor in regenerative braking of EVs, which is lost as heat for fossils vehicles.
Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by petre on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @08:21AM
(#23310205)
One can't really charge a battery with power spikes from randomly hitting the brakes. Only part of the braking energy is recoverable, for example when braking to reduce speed while descending a long slope. Braking strategy should also be different in this case: similar to engine braking in regular vehicles. Since most EVs rarely have a multi speed gearbox, regenerative braking should be built into the brake pedal.
Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by varjag on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @09:46AM
(#23311023)
In practice it works fine on all EVs I driven. Doesn't take much getting used to.
Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by rootusrootus on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @09:10AM
(#23310662)
I'd wager there are far more fossil fuel vehicles on the road with regenerative braking than there are EVs.
Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by varjag on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @09:44AM
(#23311005)
Intrigued, how would that work?
Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by organsnyder on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @10:03AM
(#23311221)
I think OP is referring to hybrid ICE vehicles.
Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by bluGill on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @09:39AM
(#23310954)
Not very much when you are on the freeway.
Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by varjag on Tuesday May 26, 2020 @09:43AM
(#23310995)
I guess if you never ever use brakes it has no advantage.
Re:New two-stroke engine design could help keep internal com...
by Hypx on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @03:17AM
(#23320300)
There's also hydrogen fuel cells to consider, which at 142 MJ / kg and 50% efficiency looks like this:
1 kg * 142 MJ / kg * 50% = 71 MJ mechanical
The dominant solution above all else.
1kg * 14 MJ/kg * 95% = 13 MJ mechanical
1kg * 47 MJ/kg * 30% = 14 MJ mechanical
It comes out pretty close!
If you want mechanical power and also heat (for keeping people, animals, or equipment warm, decreasing the viscosity of fluids, etc), ICE is definitely the way to go.
-- edit --
/u/ash points out Tesla's energy density is is 0.576 MJ/kg
1kg * 0.58 MJ/kg * 95% = 0.55 MJ mechanical
...not even slightly close.