News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube removes interview with professor of medicine on C... by zimpenfish on Friday May 22, 2020 @06:14AM (#23270437)
> Google/Youtube took down any videos where the name of the supposed whistleblower were being mentioned

Presumably because they didn't want to be exposed to the legal ramifications of broadcasting a crime?

Re:YouTube removes interview with professor of medicine on C... by Thorrez on Friday May 22, 2020 @08:33PM (#23278682)
Broadcasting a crime is illegal?
Re:YouTube removes interview with professor of medicine on C... by zimpenfish on Sunday May 24, 2020 @02:05PM (#23293305)
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/08/politics/legal-question-o...

> According to the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, the disclosure of a whistleblower's name could be a criminal offense if it is intentional, unauthorized and "the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal the covert agent's foreign intelligence relationship to the United States."

But as many pages about the Whistleblower Act will tell you, this kind of thing is uncharted territory and presumably the exact kind of uncharted territory that gives expensive lawyers for large media companies extreme willies.