The Intel Comet Lake Core i9-10900K, i7-10700K, i5-10500K CPU Review

Re:The Intel Comet Lake Core i9-10900K, i7-10700K, i5-10500K... by rb808 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @11:31AM (#23248076)

I have a six year old i5-2500 and a 10700K is quicker but still not twice as fast as the 2500. Its really not worth the upgrade.

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-2500-vs-...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Intel Comet Lake Core i9-10900K, i7-10700K, i5-10500K... by third_I on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @12:07PM (#23248522)

I concur. Dual Xeon E5-2687W here (2×8 pcores, Sandy Bridge). Turbo 3.8 GHz to 3.4 all cores. [Ebay: ~$300 each, mid 2016]

It's still more expensive to buy a brand new Threadripper or 16-core Intel (sic) than this bargain I made some 4 years ago.

I will probably get a Zen 3 platform, once each CCX contains 8 cores (4 is just too limited for my virtualization need, I kinda like that my Xeons are "monolithic").

Obviously this is for programming and shit learning, not gaming, but I can still manage my 60 fps stat with a beefy GPU.

[ Parent | on HN ]