News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Signal PINs by RL_Quine on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @05:20PM (#23240371)
I’d really like to have a more sane version of Signal as a fork, which allows the maintaining of compatibility, but given how hostile they’ve been towards this sort of thing I suspect it would be unmaintainable.
Re:Signal PINs by Jarwain on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @06:27PM (#23241035)
From what I understand, they are fine with forks of Signal as long as these forks have distinct branding and don't depend on OWS services to operate, I'd imagine because they don't want the operational burden of ensuring the compatibility of third party clients nor confused users going to OWS for support instead of the third party devs.

Which, imo, is a pretty reasonable decision.

Re:Signal PINs by marssaxman on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @05:45PM (#23240664)
I think I liked Signal better when it was just encrypting text and sending it over SMS. I noticed recently that someone has been maintaining such a fork, under the name "Silence", but haven't had a chance to try it yet.
Re:Signal PINs by cvwright on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @12:05PM (#23248496)
I used Silence as my primary SMS app for several years while I was on Android. Overall I had no complaints. Beware though, they seem to have been booted out of the Play Store at some point, so you might need to install through F-Droid.
Re:Signal PINs by jtl999 on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @05:39PM (#23240603)
They don't block third party clients ala WhatsApp, but going on GitHub and arguing with people isn't a good thing either :/