News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on New York Times phasing out all 3rd-party advertising data. Parent comment

Re:New York Times phasing out all 3rd-party advertising data by ashtonkem on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @11:44AM (#23236107)
The difference between Adblock plus and uBO doesn’t affect my point. Most people are fully capable of installing an ad blocker, and tons do.

I guess I get people wanting to piss off those who run ads, but that applies to ad blockers as a whole. That’s not an argument for Brave specifically.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:New York Times phasing out all 3rd-party advertising data by catalogia on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @11:52AM (#23236220)
Well I can't defend it further than I have. It's not my intention to provide arguments for using Brave, merely to explain why I think many people have chosen to. You and I agree that Brave isn't the browser to use, but evidently plenty of people do want to use it and I think the reasons I've described explain a lot of that. I doubt it'd be causing so much consternation if that weren't the case.

For website and ad network operators, it could be worse. Automated 'clickfraud' extensions could have gained traction. Maybe Brave will do that in the future too.

[ Parent | on HN ]