The case for national paid maternity leave

Re:The case for national paid maternity leave by yters on Monday May 18, 2020 @01:37PM (#23225628)

what if this biases employers against hiring procreative couples?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for national paid maternity leave by ceejayoz on Monday May 18, 2020 @01:44PM (#23225737)

Asking about plans to have a family or relationship status is already illegal in the US, isn't it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for national paid maternity leave by claudeganon on Monday May 18, 2020 @01:50PM (#23225833)

The United States is also a country famous for its lax enforcement of labor laws.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for national paid maternity leave by yters on Monday May 18, 2020 @02:38PM (#23226614)

Sure, but there are pretty reliable proxies, such as age.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for national paid maternity leave by ceejayoz on Monday May 18, 2020 @02:42PM (#23226668)

The chance of employers stopping hiring from the 20-35 year old age group is... slim.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for national paid maternity leave by yters on Monday May 18, 2020 @02:45PM (#23226722)

might bring about reverse ageism and balance things a bit

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for national paid maternity leave by Barrin92 on Monday May 18, 2020 @01:48PM (#23225794)

then I think we should ask them where they think their next batch of interns comes from

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The case for national paid maternity leave by syshum on Monday May 18, 2020 @02:33PM (#23226526)

Visa's ofcourse

[ Parent | on HN ]