Re:Extracting ROM constants from the 8087 math coprocessor's...
by amelius on Sunday May 17, 2020 @06:19AM
(#23210986)
Also, the first bit of the mantissa is always 1 (except for the number 0), so they could have left it out.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Extracting ROM constants from the 8087 math coprocessor's...
by kens on Sunday May 17, 2020 @12:46PM
(#23213198)
In its external representation, the 8087 omitted the leading one for the reason you suggest; it is redundant.
Your suggestion could apply to the ROM; they could have hard-coded the first bit to 1, saving a row in the ROM. I think they could have avoided a few transistors by doing this.