Re:There’s No Such Thing As ‘Ethical A.I.’
by kijin on Sunday May 17, 2020 @03:27AM
(#23210310)
> we'll have to accept the superior form of consciousness the ASI is.
On what definition of "have to"?
Large numbers of people will not only refuse to accept the ASI's interpretation of ethics, they will also refuse to acknowledge that the purported ASI is any better than ourselves/themselves when it comes to ethics. If you try to settle the matter by giving the ASI the force of law, there will be armed revolts and violent crackdowns.
Re:There’s No Such Thing As ‘Ethical A.I.’
by behnamoh on Sunday May 17, 2020 @03:34AM
(#23210352)
No need for revolts and crackdowns; the ASI will take care of everything on its own. By "have to" I meant more like "there's no other option for us", just like chimps "had to" deal with our superiority millions of years ago.
On what definition of "have to"?
Large numbers of people will not only refuse to accept the ASI's interpretation of ethics, they will also refuse to acknowledge that the purported ASI is any better than ourselves/themselves when it comes to ethics. If you try to settle the matter by giving the ASI the force of law, there will be armed revolts and violent crackdowns.