Re:Next dream job can be in an HTTP header
by esjr on Friday May 15, 2020 @06:32AM
(#23190643)
So no one has heard of RFC6648 ?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> "…in practice the benefits [of the "X-" convention] have been outweighed by the costs associated with the leakage of unstandardized parameters into the standards space."
Honestly, prefixing silly, fun or extra headers with X- like in this scenario seems pretty harmless.