Re:Patriot Act amendment needing a warrant for browsing hist...
by economicslol on Thursday May 14, 2020 @12:10PM
(#23181251)
They're not doing that to plan things, it's used intentionally for PR. Drive fear into those that watch it and recruit others who are excited. Pretty clear those are different.
Re:Patriot Act amendment needing a warrant for browsing hist...
by dontbenebby on Thursday May 14, 2020 @01:23PM
(#23182428)
But they're carrying complex recording devices, and sometimes laptops, to move the footage.
The original incidents are terrorism, and the people doing them are targeted.
Re:Patriot Act amendment needing a warrant for browsing hist...
by vlan0 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @12:21PM
(#23181417)
>ISIS has put out high definition videos of executions. That's the opposite of "not touching digital comms"
I don't think you're being fair to the context. They've been showboating killing online for decades. But showboating should not be conflated using digital communications to coordinate their efforts. I'm not saying they don't use digital communications. But this is hardly proof of that.
Re:Patriot Act amendment needing a warrant for browsing hist...
by badrabbit on Friday May 15, 2020 @01:47AM
(#23189291)
You're conflating propaganda and recruitment with organization,coordination and communication.
How long did bin laden evade capture? 20-30 years? And did they catch him because he used the internet?
Then why is terrorist content discussed so much in content moderation circles, specifically the fact that content moderators are viewing it so often it induces PTSD in them?
ISIS has put out high definition videos of executions. That's the opposite of "not touching digital comms"
https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/12/21255870/facebook-content...