News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OnlyFans, influencers, and the politics of selling nudes ... by vzidex on Thursday May 14, 2020 @11:52AM (#23181009)
Yes, we're thinking of the same website.

I've been around on 4chan long enough to know that "troll" most often is equivalent to what the site really feels, or at least some of the people on there. The "troll" or "satire" label is only there to try to evoke plausible deniability - as in the case of "for legal purposes my call for violence against this person is a joke".

i.e. the sorts of people - in general - who browse the more unsavory parts of 4chan/8chan/etc are very fond of their dogwhistles.

Re:OnlyFans, influencers, and the politics of selling nudes ... by asguy on Thursday May 14, 2020 @12:18PM (#23181367)
The way I read it, 4chan is like a concentrated version of what it was like to be a teenager at the edge of society. You stir the pot and feed off the energy that people respond with.

If you live in a Christian conservative community, you leave pamphlets full of gay porn outside church. In a progressive community, you make racist websites about interracial dating.

They aren’t pro gay porn or pro racism, they’re pro getting a reaction out of people, that they find hilarious. We encourage them with our outrage.

Re:OnlyFans, influencers, and the politics of selling nudes ... by diffrinse on Thursday May 14, 2020 @05:30PM (#23185763)
"4chan is like a concentrated version of what it was like to be a teenager at the edge of society"

Which teenagers and which edge of society, I'm fairly certain they're not all the same. Also your post is what every reader of 4chan says when the discussion comes up.

Re:OnlyFans, influencers, and the politics of selling nudes ... by asguy on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @01:07AM (#23243462)
I'm not a reader of 4chan. I just know people that are, and I try to have empathy for other people's situations.
Re:OnlyFans, influencers, and the politics of selling nudes ... by generalpass on Thursday May 14, 2020 @12:37PM (#23181688)
5 males aged 13-15 with basic self-taught networking skillz could wreak a huge amount of havoc such that it would throw off observations that are based on web activity. It is one of the reasons that anecdotal observations of online behaviors I consider to approach zero value, with some exceptions.

And, obviously, a lot of those kids are older and still engaging the same juvenile behaviors.