News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Deno 1.0. Parent comment

Re:Deno 1.0 by ricardobeat on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @08:40PM (#23173736)
Maybe this will develop into a standard of multi-process servers (real micro services you could say), where the permissions are only given to a slice of the application.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Deno 1.0 by chewzerita on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @10:10PM (#23174431)
Sounds like privilege separation[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privilege_separation

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Deno 1.0 by svieira on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @09:28PM (#23174125)
That sounds like the Postfix architecture [1]

[1]: https://www.akadia.com/services/postfix_mta.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Deno 1.0 by BubRoss on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @09:23PM (#23174088)
Reinventing QNX will always be cutting edge.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Deno 1.0 by pupdogg on Thursday May 14, 2020 @08:46AM (#23178768)
QNX is hands down amazing! No car manufacturer could ever come close to having their in-house infotainment system being as snappy as QNX...which is why they gave up and switched to QNX! Fine print: Tesla not included.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Deno 1.0 by bgdam on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @08:57PM (#23173878)
Now that would indeed be an interesting way of building servers.
[ Parent | on HN ]