News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by austincheney on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @09:03AM (#23166469)
Age of children is also factor. I suspect people enjoy the escape an office provides when they have toddlers. I really enjoy having lunch with my teenage kids everyday thanks to Covid. Working from home has been a blessing.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by ryanSrich on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @11:54AM (#23168165)
Kids are a spectrum. The lockdown is so different depending on how old your kids are:

Infant = stressed, but manageable

Toddler = worst case scenario

Young child = second worst case scenario

Teen = enjoyable

Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by jdreaver on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @12:07PM (#23168332)
As someone with an infant and a toddler, working from home, this hits the nail on the head. I have been working remotely my whole career, and I love it, but working at home _with_ children there is about 5x harder.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by briandear on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @01:02PM (#23169005)
I have four kids under age 8, including a two-year-old.

Brutal doesn’t begin to describe it.

Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by mcv on Thursday May 14, 2020 @06:04AM (#23177623)
I've got an 11 year old and a 5 year old. Sometimes I tell the oldest to go play with his brother, so they both won't bother us.

This tends to work very well for about 30 minutes, and then they're in a fight.

Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by allendoerfer on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @12:01PM (#23168264)
So essentially: Kids are annoying. Babies are sweet though.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by kelnos on Thursday May 14, 2020 @04:18AM (#23176875)
More or less. Young kids want your attention and don't have the capacity to understand why you can't give it and have to focus on something else for 8 hours, so they'll just keep interrupting you. Babies require your attention periodically for basic-life needs or general fussiness but nothing beyond that (which is stressful, but not intellectually taxing). Teenagers are likely a bag of contradictions, but at least they understand the concept of working all day and needing space to concentrate. You can reason with a 15 year old, but not a 5 year old.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by mac01021 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @06:39AM (#23177850)
I'm mostly solving this issue with my 3-year old by playing with her all day (save for an hour or two of meetings) and then catching up on work at night, at the expense of a bunch of sleep.

I'm lucky that my software job is mostly conducive to this...

Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by JshWright on Thursday May 14, 2020 @08:34AM (#23178661)
Twin three year olds and a seven year old here...
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by garborg on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @09:12AM (#23166545)
My and my spouses co-workers seem to be split on whether or not they have young kids at home that they're supposed to be watching while they work. My spouse and I are lucky enough to have help watching our kids and seeing them more as well as getting those prep and commute hours back is such a blessing.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by matwood on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @09:29AM (#23166671)
I ignored kids because that should not be typical of a long-term WFH situation. All of my WFH coworkers still use day cares, etc...
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever by mattmillr on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @04:27PM (#23171444)
My kids are 1 and 3, going to work at the office was definitely the easier part of my day before WFH started! I consider it a good week now if I'm mostly attentive in all the meetings I have and get a modicum of actual work done.