Re:Ask HN: Why do companies care about their own valuation?
by shoo on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @06:40AM
(#23165499)
Same argument is also possible if the CEO/board/other insiders have a decent chunk of their net worth as options for the company stock. But in that case, the increase in insider net worth can be highly nonlinear as a function of the price of the company's share price.
Re:Ask HN: Why do companies care about their own valuation?
by pmiller2 on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @07:13AM
(#23165681)
> That's one of negative things about stocks in general in my opinion, because people quite often have short-term (lasting a quarter or two) outlook.
That could be easily fixed by requiring all executive and board members' stock to be held for, say, 3 years after vesting before selling.
Re:Ask HN: Why do companies care about their own valuation?
by lberk on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @07:25AM
(#23165741)
Has it really vested at that point then?
Or is it just a longer vesting period?
Re:Ask HN: Why do companies care about their own valuation?
by bruce511 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @01:30AM
(#23175687)
I guess that depends on your understanding of "vesting" - and my understanding may be faulty.
As I understand it, if I leave the business before the vesting I get nothing. When the stock vests it becomes mine.
A lock down of the stock then means I can't trade it, but it remains mine (regardless of whether I stay or leave.) Once the lock is lifted I could sell it.
So in that sense there's a difference, yes.
That's one of negative things about stocks in general in my opinion, because people quite often have short-term (lasting a quarter or two) outlook.