Usually the misleadiness goes no deeper than the headline, but in this case the article is also contributing, and maybe not only the article but the statements the article is reporting on. "Stay-at-home orders will with all certainty be extended for the next three months" is a strange way to describe the process of opening up. Most likely this way of putting it is the product of some political constraint-solving.

I've replaced the title with a phrase from the article that manages to be both accurate and noncommittal.