The stimulus is intended to protect jobs and livelihoods, not to react to movements in the stock market (even if the current president seems to think so)
For better or worse, agreed or not, the US' gov diverted - for now? - an implosion. The Fed can't eliminate risk. It also can't guarantee future returns.
More than $3 billion for "research and development of vaccines, as well as therapeutics and diagnostics"
$2.2 billion "in public health funding to aid in prevention, preparedness and response efforts — including $950 million to support state and local agencies"
Almost $1 billion for "medical supplies, health-care preparedness, Community Health Centers and medical surge capacity"
$1.25 billion to fight COVID-19 internationally.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_Preparedness_and_R...
I'm referencing the CARE Act.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_Aid,_Relief,_and_E...
Granted the one you reference was passed prior, the CARE Act was introduced first. The CARE Act was never in danger of being dropped, as the market was counting on it (it is filled with pork).
[0]: https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/04/investing/fed-junk-bonds-etfs...
[1]: https://twitter.com/TruthGundlach/status/1256352949787176960
You invest for a return. Stopping a slide yesterday has little to do with getting a return tomorrow.
The future. New products. New ideas. Etc. That's where a return comes from. Not the Fed.
The FED only steps in for once in a lifetime risks that impacts the market broadly. Any risk specific to individual firms, which is all the risk between these broad market events.
[0]http://www.adriendavernas.com/papers/valuationofbanks.pdf
Those risks overlap. It's not effectively once-in-a-lifetime, as of the last century.