Re:Scunthorpe Sans – a self-censoring font
by np_tedious on Sunday May 10, 2020 @07:32AM
(#23131848)
Can these ligatures be applied recursively?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That sounds unlikely, ligatures are two or more consecutive graphemes graphemes joined into a single glyph, but only visually. The underlying text is unmodified, so as far as the renderer is concerned, the text is still "arsenal".
Recursively how?
Re:Scunthorpe Sans – a self-censoring font
by np_tedious on Sunday May 10, 2020 @09:43PM
(#23138100)
Pretty sure the answer is "no" but I'll explain more what I was wondering.
Assume "arse" and "anal" are both on the bad and that underscores are treated like irrelevant whitespace.
Arsenal
A___nal
A______
You mean "arse" and "enal"? So basically overlaps? That's a good question, I'm not sure what happens there, I think the first ligature "wins".
Yeah, if you type "cuntits" it only censors "unt".
Re:Scunthorpe Sans – a self-censoring font
by np_tedious on Monday May 11, 2020 @06:10AM
(#23140524)
No. I mean first the "arse" rule is applied, and then the "anal" rule (because this didn't exist previously and because the blanked out letters are ignored) is applied next
Oh, I see. No, that's not how ligatures work. I also don't see why A___nal would be censored, it's clearly not intended to be a curseword.
Re:Scunthorpe Sans – a self-censoring font
by np_tedious on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @08:30AM
(#23153200)
Just running with the idea expressed an a parent comment above. I think neither "anal" nor "arse" should be censored