Re:James Damore and three others end Google suit
by pas on Saturday May 09, 2020 @07:11PM
(#23128996)
One counterexample doesn't "disprove" the correlation. (Mostly because the example is in the correlation already, and the correlation holds, plus it's just a correlation.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:James Damore and three others end Google suit
by UncleMeat on Sunday May 10, 2020 @12:55AM
(#23130401)
The comment I responded to very clearly implies that this "things, not people" is the reason for gender imbalance in CS. They are doing far more than identifying a correlation.
Re:James Damore and three others end Google suit
by afiori on Sunday May 10, 2020 @03:04AM
(#23130850)
That can be one of many factors. The alleged claim is that "CS fits nicely in this model", whether microbiology also fits is a different question. Also microbiology is closer to medical field than engineering.
Re:James Damore and three others end Google suit
by UncleMeat on Sunday May 10, 2020 @01:03PM
(#23134145)
> The alleged claim is that "CS fits nicely in this model"
And there is no evidence provided for this at all.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23129035 sorry for crude link to links