Re:For cops who kill, special Supreme Court protection
by AnthonyMouse on Friday May 08, 2020 @12:48PM
(#23116755)
The difference is that a seatbelt or a vest or a set of handcuffs doesn't escalate existing conflicts or cause civilian fatalities.
Or to put it another way, aren't you arguing that all civilians should carry firearms as well? After all, there could be a mugger, or a rapist, or a grizzly bear. Better to have it and not need it, right?
Or to put it another way, aren't you arguing that all civilians should carry firearms as well? After all, there could be a mugger, or a rapist, or a grizzly bear. Better to have it and not need it, right?