News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:For cops who kill, special Supreme Court protection by sokoloff on Friday May 08, 2020 @12:20PM (#23116470)
It's a fairly common occurrence for me to drive to the grocery store, buy my groceries, and return home without crashing. Yet, I wear my seatbelt for the worst-case outcome not the typical or most common outcome.

Likewise, I wouldn't issue police equipment based on the extremely common case where a policeman doesn't need a vest nor a gun all day and, in fact, on the majority of days doesn't even need their set of handcuffs.

Re:For cops who kill, special Supreme Court protection by AnthonyMouse on Friday May 08, 2020 @12:48PM (#23116755)
The difference is that a seatbelt or a vest or a set of handcuffs doesn't escalate existing conflicts or cause civilian fatalities.

Or to put it another way, aren't you arguing that all civilians should carry firearms as well? After all, there could be a mugger, or a rapist, or a grizzly bear. Better to have it and not need it, right?