One single bug is why their process is bananas inappropriate? I really hope all of your code is perfect every single time to be acting so high and mighty.

This isn't exactly the first time Facebook has been called out for poor engineering practices:

https://www.darkcoding.net/software/facebooks-code-quality-p...

https://blog.timac.org/2017/0410-analysis-of-the-facebook-ap...

So what? They're an enormous engineering company with many millions of lines of code. Bugs are expected.

Those criticisms aren't about mere bugs, but a bloated over-engineered iOS apps with far too many classes (18k back in 2015) [0]. The Android app was also previously notorious for patching Dalvik at runtime to deal with the huge number of Java methods [1].

Granted, perhaps things have gotten better in the last five years.

It's certainly possible for an enormous engineering company to have poor code quality or poor engineering practices, despite having a high interviewing standard. And a criticism of Facebook need not be a criticism of all companies that interview by Leetcode, for instance no one here is criticizing Google, Amazon, or Apple, and all have better reputations for code quality.

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/iOSProgramming/comments/6upeu6/how_...

[1] https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/under-th...

I think I’ve done things like what Facebook did, when I was writing one-off security exploit scripts. Someone needs to stop that team.

This is so shortsighted it’s painful.

You’re describing the attitude Facebook takes towards candidates, not the attitude I take towards anything.

Candidates should be saying to Facebook, “ I really hope all of your code is perfect every single time to be acting so high and mighty” and absolutely making a huge deal out of a case like this when it isn’t.

> “ You are making a MASSIVE assumption that most people dislike Leetcode.”

No, this is not an assumption.

Well I like Leetcode type interviews a lot.