News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by elcomet on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @11:19AM (#23091943)
Also, websites have no incentives to implement such a feature if it's not required by law.

It costs money and gives them nothing in return

Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by close04 on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @11:59AM (#23092528)
The solution is to send a message by avoiding those sites thus creating a disincentive for them to maintain the practices. But as you can see from the number of upvotes even very technically literate people will get over this just for an interesting title.

Techcrunch routinely ends up on the front page on HN, ironically many times for articles that condemn the very practices they engage in. No website will change their practices because of strong, informed opinions when the clicks still come in, especially from a distinguished community like HN that just validates Techcrunch's choices.

Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by ViViDboarder on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @11:38AM (#23092220)
Well, GDPR and CCPA compliance cost something. That could be made simpler using this option.

Also, Ad Blockers are becoming quite prevalent again. Personally, I’ve started using one again for privacy reasons. If a publisher would actually respect my Do Not Track request, I’d happily leave their ads up. I have no problem with contextual advertising.

So that’s revenue left on the table.

Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by nicbou on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @12:29PM (#23092971)
It would not be easier. It has to be implemented in addition to the consent form.

I have a website. If I wanted to support DNT, I'd have to take an hour or two to figure it out. To be honest, it wasn't even on my radar.