News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by Mirioron on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @10:19AM (#23091212)
This should've been what was done from the get go. Browsers have given us control over cookies for a very long time now. But hey, it's the EU, there's a reason the EU has a lack of tech companies. I'm sure that when they finally do what you suggest they'll screw it up somehow as well.
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by dgellow on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @10:23AM (#23091263)
You want regulators to design APIs?
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by Mirioron on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @10:42AM (#23091494)
What I want is irrelevant. I have as much say about what happens in the EU as I have say in US politics despite being from the EU. The politicians will do something stupid regardless and then years later not understand why things are going poorly. Meanwhile the Germans and French will love it, because it screws those evil evil American companies. So, the regulators might as well design APIs. It's hard to imagine that it would end up any worse than their usual.
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by rsynnott on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @11:50AM (#23092401)
Regulators designing, or at least mandating, an API isn't that weird a concept; for instance that's how PSD2 open banking works in some countries.
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by lifeAsNerd on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @11:05AM (#23091784)
I'm pretty grossed out that the internet has been taken over by the government.

Blocking cookies should be done by users via software.

This is only going to make the barrier to entry higher and more expensive.

I have no idea what many small non tech businesses would do? Pay a few thousand every year when standards change?

Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by boomlinde on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @11:51AM (#23092413)
> This is only going to make the barrier to entry higher and more expensive.

That's the point. We want the barrier to entry in widespread tracking to be high.

For what it's worth, you don't need cookie consent warnings if you use them only for functionality integral to the product you offer your user. For example, if you need to use a cookie to facilitate a logged-in user session, you don't need to warn them.

The only ones paying the high price is the people who use it to collect user information not essential to the service they provide to the user, for god knows what.

Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by saagarjha on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @06:01PM (#23096843)
Actually, we want to to be so high that nobody (including massive companies) can circumvent user consent.
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU... by dgellow on Thursday May 07, 2020 @03:26AM (#23100598)
> Blocking cookies should be done by users via software.

That’s what is done.

The government doesn’t block cookies for you, they set the rules with user data, and the actors (service providers and users) act accordingly.

That’s how things should be.

I don’t want the governments to build or design software, I want them to set the rules and let browser developers and other actors react accordingly. If the reaction isn’t judged well intended or good enough, they are sanctioned accordingly.