Re:Rosetta: The Engine Behind Cray’s Slingshot Exascale-Era ...
by gnufx on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @05:28AM
(#23089225)
Indeed. Infiniband was even meant for "datacentre" use, and I have better experience of it in compute clusters than Ethernet apart from the performance.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rosetta: The Engine Behind Cray’s Slingshot Exascale-Era ...
by duxup on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @10:40AM
(#23091478)
Infiniband is pretty neat for a given use case but that cable length kinda killed it for many data center use cases.
Still, if folks can deal with those short distances there's lots of inexpensive equipment out there.
Re:Rosetta: The Engine Behind Cray’s Slingshot Exascale-Era ...
by gnufx on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @02:40PM
(#23094717)
Point taken, but for some time Mellanox has touted at least cross-campus-type IB. I never persuaded anyone to evaluate it for use between two machine rooms, but there were obvious non-HPC cases for it within them. I'd be interested to know how the long distance stuff actually works, not being a beginner with sales talk.
Re:Rosetta: The Engine Behind Cray’s Slingshot Exascale-Era ...
by duxup on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @02:44PM
(#23094764)
That's a good question. I haven't used it but extending infinaband ... I'm guessing there's some sort of intermediary devices doing some sort of piplining or emulation, that's usually how that works out.