News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Post Mortem on Salt Incident by lasdfas on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @11:46PM (#23087729)
I agree. I would like to seem more details of how they determined it was only crypto mining. Finding only mining scripts in your logs doesn't mean they were not running other code once they had root.
Re:Post Mortem on Salt Incident by sterlind on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @12:02AM (#23087796)
It seems bizarre to me that a crypto miner got in. It wouldn't make much money on regular CPUs, and the high processor usage would immediately draw attention. So it looks like a low-effort botnet, which is embarrassing to get pwned by.

(The coin mining could be a cover like you mention, but it seems unlikely since it naturally draws attention.)

Re:Post Mortem on Salt Incident by vertex-four on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @04:30AM (#23088960)
It’s easier to sell Monero for cash than... some random data from some random company.
Re:Post Mortem on Salt Incident by itsajoke on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @01:26AM (#23088126)
I once worked at a place where a minor piece of cloud infra got exploited. All the attacker did was run a monero miner on it.
Re:Post Mortem on Salt Incident by sterlind on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @02:35AM (#23088406)
Heh, in a way it makes a good bug bounty. Like if popping calc got you a trickle of income.
Re:Post Mortem on Salt Incident by optimiz3 on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @12:22AM (#23087882)
> It wouldn't make much money on regular CPUs

Not true; some PoWs such as Random-X are designed to be most efficient CPUs.

Re:Post Mortem on Salt Incident by nemo136 on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @04:00AM (#23088826)
running the virus code in a container / vm and checking what gets modified