News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on U.S. Army to integrate power cables into a tactical vest. Parent comment

Re:U.S. Army to integrate power cables into a tactical vest by sandworm101 on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @02:10PM (#23082935)
>> I get it that there a large portions of the military who don't show up to play when their widgets stop working.

Ya. Air Force and Navy are defined by their widgets. If the aircraft cannot fly, the air force cannot air force. If the ships don't float, the navy doesn't navy. That's the cultural difference. The army has trouble dealing with 100% reliance on anything. For pilots and sailors such reliance comes natually.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Army to integrate power cables into a tactical vest by goatinaboat on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @02:31PM (#23083170)
If the ships don't float, the navy doesn't navy.

But if the radio doesn’t work the Navy even today can fall back to light signals or even semaphore or flag codes. That’s the point, there isn’t just reliability, there is also redundancy.

If the tanks cannot tank, the army can’t army against a near-peer enemy either...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Army to integrate power cables into a tactical vest by evgen on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @03:46PM (#23084071)
Are you trying to suggest that a ship without BVR comm is in any way, shape, or form an effective warfighting asset? Take away radios, radar, and satcomm and that ship just became nothing more than the USS Target.
[ Parent | on HN ]