Re:Surveillance plane starts flying over Baltimore
by dx87 on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @08:59AM
(#23079524)
Guns rights advocates are less likely to live in cities, so this doesn't affect them. Besides, the people in cities are the ones who commonly vote to take away gun rights, so it could be a case of "this is what they get for continually voting to take rights away".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Surveillance plane starts flying over Baltimore
by taborj on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @09:53AM
(#23080016)
I disagree with your first part (gun rights advocates live everywhere, even if they're not as vocal), but I do agree with your second part (you reap what you sow).
This is an effect of slowly giving up rights over the years.
Re:Surveillance plane starts flying over Baltimore
by rmcpherson on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @05:21PM
(#23085210)
Which rights have been given up, specifically? Clearly not gun rights.
Re:Surveillance plane starts flying over Baltimore
by taborj on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @10:56PM
(#23087515)
Well, seeing as how the second amendment says "shall not be infringed", it could be argued that any law restricting arms ownership is in violation. In fact, you'll find many folks with that opinion.
Re:Surveillance plane starts flying over Baltimore
by grimjack00 on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @06:46PM
(#23086021)
Given up? Perhaps not.
Greatly restricted? Definitely.