Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by Analemma_ on Monday May 04, 2020 @09:29AM
(#23067783)
I’m curious which FAANG you worked at that strongly discouraged WFH. I’ve worked at two now, including the one that’s sort of notorious for treating employees terribly, and both of them were fine with WFH when necessary. I sort of got the sense that they were all more or less OK with it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by kleinsch on Monday May 04, 2020 @10:41AM
(#23068627)
I work at a FAANG. They’re OK with you working from home 1-2 days/week to run errands, etc, but not OK with 100% WFH except rare exceptions (usually people who have been at the company a while before moving). That may be what OP means. I’ll be curious to see if fully remote becomes more of a possibility based on how the next few months go.
Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by acituan on Monday May 04, 2020 @12:32PM
(#23070050)
That changes wildly from team to team. I worked for one team where there was a set WFH day of the week. I had another team where 11am standup meetings were held everyday, and this was mostly for the benefit of the people manage who was very technically disinterested in what’s going on but wanted to enforce “coherence”, needless to say WFH was impossible. In another team, manager wasn’t comfortable allowing WFH because “it would create inequality between engineers” i.e he was just afraid of making a judgement call. Finally, had a team where manager would WFH 1-3 times a week himself and was actually the best manager of all in terms of being on top of things.
The sentiment that this is heavily dependent on manager competence is correct IMHO.
Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by pgm8705 on Monday May 04, 2020 @10:04AM
(#23068180)
My guess is Apple.
Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by starpilot on Monday May 04, 2020 @12:17PM
(#23069861)
People only say FAANG instead of FANG if it's Apple. Otherwise I could only see it as Amazon. But Amazon had people WFH almost immediately, since being here in Seattle it was the start of the outbreak in the US.
Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by saagarjha on Monday May 04, 2020 @12:51PM
(#23070354)
> People only say FAANG instead of FANG if it's Apple.
I don't think this is true. Actually, most people would like to replace "N" with "M" in that acronym, but then it sounds much worse…
Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by nostrademons on Monday May 04, 2020 @12:56PM
(#23070425)
I'm partial to "MAGA" as the initialism for the top 4 tech companies by market cap (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Apple). Facebook and Netflix are a tier below in market cap and size, and it also makes it clear who's really making America great again...
Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by WorldMaker on Monday May 04, 2020 @02:50PM
(#23071802)
I've seen GAFAM a lot, and that's the one I tend to favor.
MAFANG (maybe?) if you really want to get Netflix in there? I know some people especially in the Bay Area think Netflix is important in the acronym not necessarily by market cap, but overall head count versus turnover and thus cultural swing (policies like "unlimited vacation" that started at Netflix and then in turn influenced a lot of other surrounding Bay Area companies).
Re:Companies consider abandoning open office layouts to prev...
by cameronbrown on Monday May 04, 2020 @12:23PM
(#23069946)
It could be any. All FAANGs have their subcultures.