News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Systemd, ten years later: a historical and technical retr... by cat199 on Sunday May 03, 2020 @10:32PM (#23063997)
> how open-source projects work

they work differently depending on the project.

so this statement:

> requires buy-in from an unusually large number of parties since it affects the OS, everyone shipping daemons, and the operators.

is only true in some cases.

c.f. rcng, which was developed by a very small few people, and is a generally sane improvement on previous BSD init that i've really never heard any complaints against vs the previous method.

same could have been true here. it was not - and the need for 'consensus' was largely sidestepped by the 'market pressure' of gnome being dependent on systemd features, and the leading core desktop environment that people had already attached themselves to, esp in the enterprise market.

Re:Systemd, ten years later: a historical and technical retr... by pas on Monday May 04, 2020 @07:25AM (#23066706)
Debian voted on the issue, and there was a very lengthy discussion. I don't think the Gnome dependency was the linchpin, at all. Debian developers wanted to get rid of thousands of silent but deadly shell scripts shipped in every package doing service management (rc scripts), they wanted nice cgroup integration, and that's it. At least this was my impression.