News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Systemd, ten years later: a historical and technical retrospective. Parent comment

Re:Systemd, ten years later: a historical and technical retr... by hedora on Sunday May 03, 2020 @10:21PM (#23063932)
Based on one of the sibling comments, if you modify screen to add a runtime dependency on systemd, the problem will go away.

I agree this is totally unacceptable, and that the inevitable tone deaf response to such complaints is also unacceptable.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Systemd, ten years later: a historical and technical retr... by Spivak on Monday May 04, 2020 @02:13PM (#23071379)
Is it that weird that if you want to run a job in the background outside your session that ask your service manager to spawn the job?

I mean all of this is just a difference of opinion between, "I want a process supervisor to manage all my background jobs" and "I just want to double fork and throw processes at init."

[ Parent | on HN ]