Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot
by softwarejosh on Sunday May 03, 2020 @04:26PM
(#23061608)
the parts list for the puppet is a joke everything is overkill for no reason you could easily do it for 200 same size and function
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot
by TaylorAlexander on Sunday May 03, 2020 @04:46PM
(#23061721)
I've built several servo powered walking robots. Torque is a major concern, and obviously weight plays a part in how much torque is required. The recommended servos look to be $30 each, x12 means $360. If you spent $200 just on servos you'd have to settle for $16 servos. Probably less torque. That would mean that at full leg extension the robot might not be able to support itself. That would be an annoyance when trying to focus on walking algorithm development, which is usually the fun part for these small walkers.
You can definitely do something for cheaper, but I wouldn't call this a joke. When I was 15 (20 years ago lol) I designed an 18 servo hexapod. I saved up $350 from cleaning horse stalls and my dad agreed to pay the other half, and I spent $700 on servos. It was great to learn about inverse kinematics before ever setting foot on a college campus!
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot
by jsjohnst on Monday May 04, 2020 @08:12AM
(#23067014)
> You can definitely do something for cheaper
If the 35kg is in fact needed (which I’m not prepared to debate, probably needed, but I can’t prove / disprove), you are exactly right. Yes, you could maybe save a couple dollars with cheaper servo brands, but honestly for a 35kg servo, you’re going to pay a decent amount for 12 of them.
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot
by TaylorAlexander on Monday May 04, 2020 @09:13PM
(#23075320)
Yes and I noticed this robot can jump completely off the ground. Pretty nice!
Now we're curious about what part replacements you'd suggest.