My heuristic is the following: Legged robotics is hard. Four legged robots are even harder than six legged ones. Using hobby servos makes the task even harder. You can find a lot of succesfull hexapod projects with hobby servos but up until fairly recently no four legged ones.
These robots operate in a very thight spot of the design space. The motors have to be fast enough to be responsive, but torquey enough to bear the dynamic loads. The mechanism has to be compliant enough to not overstress the gears but not too springy lets the robot collapse into a mess. The structure has to be rigid enough to support the forces, but also light enough so the legs can carry it. All in all designing a four legged walking robot with hobby servos is a hard problem. It is very easy to put together something which looks like a dog robot and even easier to feel that once the hardware is there from then on it is only a software problem to make it walk. For many possible designs that is false. Not even the best software could make them work.
This is what i know about the problem space. And then I look at the spot micro. It looks awesome. Clearly they made it to mime the spot mini robot. The problem is that all that is superflous. It is a design fetish. Maybe they put in all the effort to design the right leg lengths and the appropriate springyness and carefully considered the torque and thermal limits of those servos and come to the conclusion that they can afford the extra grams. But it is more likely that they did none of that and just made the 3d drawings look cool.
If you build the Stanford Pupper you will eventually probably end up with a walking robot. The video where they show it perform on the stage is a pinacle of a lot of tweaking and design work. I just don’t see the same about the spot micro.